THE CATHOLIC CRISIS
Sexual abuse
committed by catholic clergy at virtually all levels upon innocent children and
young seminarians over the past half century has dragged the church into a
damaging crisis. Church leaders have proven to be incapable of resolving this
problem. Failure to resolve this terrible problem has lead, or at least
seriously contributed, to millions of the faithful walking away from their churches
- many of which have closed their doors for lack of support, and the burdensome
cash settlements to thousands of the victims of predatory priests and bishops.
Latest
estimates say that there are 40, 500 catholic priests in America. It is also
estimated that between 15 to 52% of these clerics are homosexual. (Wikipedia) Now
that may or may not alarm you, but when you consider the fact that only 4% of
the American population is homosexual, that is a pretty overwhelming population
of the occupants of our rectories. You might ask; what has this got to do with
our sexual abuse crisis? In the balance of this essay I will try to justify my sense
that the dense population of homosexual clergy are at the very root of the
problem.
We were all
taught very early on that our priests are holy men and deserving of all of the
respect and dignity of a “man of God.” These men in black suits with roman
collars are a symbol of our church and respected by everybody in our
neighborhoods, Catholics and non-Catholic’s alike. We call them “Father.” Many of our mothers
dream of the possibility that one of their sons will grow up to have a call to
the vocation of the priesthood. We go to the confessional and bare our souls to
them. We depend upon their hands to deliver the Holy Sacraments, The body and
blood of Christ, they baptize our children. We seek out their guidance in
troubled times. We trust them. These are very special people. They are the
walking around representatives of Jesus Christ. Much is asked and much is expected
of these men of God.
These men
are no slouches. It is not easy to become a priest. A four year degree in
Philosophy, and 4-5 years in Graduate School, and Seminary earning a Master of
Divinity Degree. This is a long and difficult process during which candidates
for the priesthood are shaped and molded every day of their lives with the goal
of the Holy Sacrament of Ordination. Every man is keenly aware of the
requirements of Canon Law that dictates the obligations and functions of a
priest. They are fully aware of their required vows of obedience and celibacy
which will govern the balance of their lives as a priest. During those 8-10
years these adult men have ample opportunity to decide if this is the way they
want to dedicate their lives to Jesus Christ and his followers.
There is no
doubt in my mind that each of these men has a keen understanding of their
sexual preferences. History of seminary life has proven that at some point they will be tested by a homosexual priest
or fellow seminarian. Read
“Goodbye, Good Men” to learn why so many young men have abandoned the seminary
to escape predatory homosexual men. It is an obvious matter of fact that many
men have proceeded to their ordination, fully knowing that their same-sex
preference, at the very minimum, will eventually and adversely negatively impact
their lives as a priest. In effect they are FRAUDS. Their homosexual persuasion
fly’s in the face of their sacred vows to strictly adhere to Canon Law.
Code of Canons Chapter III:
Can. 277 1.
Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the
sake of the Kingdom of Heaven and therefore are bound to celibacy.
2. Clerics
are to behave with due prudence towards persons
whose company they keep that can endanger their obligations to observe contenance
or give rise to the observance of their obligations.
Among all of
the Canons, and there are many that our priests vow to observe, these two are
the most germane to our subject:
Continence refers to self-restraint, especially
in regard to sexual activity temperance and moderation.
Celibacy refers to remaining unmarried.
These two Canons,
although controversial in some circles, are clear and unambiguous.
In all of
our lives and work we must comply with law. As children we must obey our
parents and teachers. At work we must comply with established rules and
regulations of our employer, and law governing the operation of businesses. We
are also taught and learn by example to follow and adhere to the social mores
of society. Failure to comply has consequences, anywhere from “go to your
room,” “you’re fired,” or you are “guilty as charged” and go to jail.
There are
many “oaths” and/or vows that most of us take at one time or another, whether
it is jury duty; entering the military; or getting married. The question here
is; how seriously do you take your pledge to uphold the law, to tell the truth
or join in Holy Matrimony? There can be very serious consequences if you fail
to keep your promises. Few, if any vows are as important or weigh as heavily as
the vows seminarians take at the time of their ordination. Unlike any other
vow, these men have dedicated a decade or more in preparation for this
magnificent moment. This is clearly the most pivotal moment of their lives.
The decision
to take that final step into the life of the priesthood must and should be made
with no reservations. There must be no doubt that you can, with the help of
God, spend the rest of your life as a spokesman for Jesus Christ and to
administer the Sacraments that He created, and to uphold Canons Law.
In recent
years the church has modified its views on homosexuality. Essentially the
church is saying that it is ok to be homosexual so long as you abstain from
sexual activity. That is the same rule
for heterosexual people. In short, sex outside of marriage is a sin. I get
that. The church is trying to be politically correct in the era of
inclusiveness. This edict does not seem, in my opinion, to address
homosexuality in the priesthood. The bar is set much higher for the clergy, and
it flies in the face of Canon Law.
Let me pose
this question: How do we come to know that one priest or another is homosexual?
How does the subject surface? Generally speaking most folks do not go about
flaunting their sexual preferences. Or do they? When we meet a traditional married
man we assume that he is heterosexual because of his marital status, a
reasonable assumption. On the other hand, in polite society when we meet a
single man or a priest we do not ask
him about their sexual preferences. As it says in Holy Scripture, we will be
judged by our deeds. Rightly or wrongly mortals judge their fellow men
essentially by what they say and do, and how they do it. Unfortunately we come
to know that a priest is homosexual by his words and deeds. Usually it is not
good news. The damage has been done.
Some say
that a “gay” priest is ok so long as he abstains from sex. I’m not buying that.
For some reason that I do not understand, homosexual men historically are
extremely promiscuous. Don’t take my word for it, check it out. Much has been
written. Homosexual men are widely known to have had as many as hundreds of
sexual partners, whereas heterosexual men may have 8-10 sexual partners in
their lifetime. This leads me to believe that achieving sexual gratification
weighs more heavily on the minds of homosexual men. To me that sounds like a
bad habit, an obsession, a controlling factor, and a distraction in our
day-to-day comings and goings. A dominant factor!
There are
those who claim that pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality and vice
versa. That may be, but the record speaks for itself. Something like 98% of the
victims of sexual abuse by clergy are young boys. That is a male-on-male homosexual
act. Since most of the victims are 16 or under that makes the homosexual perpetrator
a pedophile.
Why do you
suppose most of the victims are youngsters? Simple answer, they are easy
targets, “low hanging fruit” They trust their priests. Their parents trust the
priests. In seminary life older priests are in very powerful positions. Many
have abused their high office to lure young men into their bedrooms. Tough
to swallow, but true.
In life we
come to know the “bad actors” in our world mostly by what they do. This is
especially true in the priesthood where clergy live and work together in a very
close relationship. They call it collegiality. These men get to know one
another the same as you get to know your close friends, family, classmates,
work mates etc. In a diocese everybody knows everybody. Priests, as the saying
goes, “know where all the bodies are buried.” If there is a homosexual priest
among them, chances are very high that they will know about it. Given that
situation, and since the hierarchy has not
effectively dealt with the predatory priest problem, I believe that it is
incumbent upon priests themselves at the parish level to do something.
It is way
above my pay grade to spell out what actions priests may take to address this
problem. As I have said before, these men are no slouches. They will figure it
out, each in his own way. In the final analysis it comes down to decisions and
choices. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. The
late comedian Flip Wilson playing the Character “Geraldine” used to say: “The
Devil made me do it.” That line always got a lot of laughs, but we all knew who
the guilty party really was.
Let us pray:
Dear Jesus, as you drove the money changers out of the Temple, please give our
holy and faithful priests the faculty to find a way and means of cleansing our
churches, rectories and seminaries of those who harm our children and seek to
destroy your Holy Church.
Amen